I disagree... the offense hasn't evolved in 3 yrs.
This quote tells me he's full of it >
His mechanics are not the same... at least 3 or more former QB and HC have seen it but our hometown brown nosing reporter says he's fine ? I call BS fluff piece.

Sorry
I got kicked off the air by a local sports talk show for trying to discuss ARs mechanics. The host dismissed me, saying he didn't want to go there unless I was an NFL QB or was QB coach at a high level"
I tried firing back with "you don't need to be a QB coach to see he's different. Put in a tape from '10 or '11 vs now and look at all the little..." and that's when i got cut.
The host then after that started going off on 'armchair quarterbacks' and how if the Packers coaching staff wasn't seeing this stuff we certainly shouldn't get into the minutiae of playing QB at that level.
Well, that made me mad, and later towards the end of the show, I called just to talk to the producer, and told him that I was the guy from before who was commenting on ARs poor fundamentals. And that, sure, I wasn't an NFL QB, but I was a db at a big xii school for three years and broke down film on plenty of qbs of varying talent-and-skill levels, and I've coached defenses/dbs for various HS and DIII programs in WI, so I know what good QB mechanics look like, and what bad QB mechanics look like, and AR is looking more like the latter.
I told him to tell the host that, and if they needed proof, I'd be happy to get letters/emails from some of my former coaches and some of the guys above me on the various staffs I'd been on.
He said he'd pass it along, and the next day I had an email from the host offering that if I could prove what I said, he'd want to have me as a regular contributor. I said back that unless we'd open up with a live, on-air apology, he could go piss off.
Never heard back.
The point: wanna tick me off? Tell me I'm wrong without giving me the opportunity to prove it so.
Long story made short: AR is still playing off, and had plenty of poor throws (and a couple bad decisions/reads) against the Bears. The difference is that the WR are running high-percentage type routes, and there were some really good catches against a really bad secondary.