2022 NFL News

GBP4EVER said:
Report that Heniz had originally had a 20 year deal that paid $57 million dollars or $2.85 million a year. Acrisure 10 year deal will pay more than $10 million a year.
Click to expand...
Not a shock. Fin Tech is deep pocket VC
 
GBP4EVER said:
Report that Heniz had originally had a 20 year deal that paid $57 million dollars or $2.85 million a year. Acrisure 10 year deal will pay more than $10 million a year.
Click to expand...
I’ve heard it’s a 15 year deal
 
FlaPack said:
Personally I would
Click to expand...
I am guessing GB would "listen" but my guess to get the rights to rename lambeau I am guessing they would have to be blown away with a offer. Though I could also see them do something like Coca-Cola presents Lambeau Field.
 
GBP4EVER said:
I am guessing GB would "listen" but my guess to get the rights to rename lambeau I am guessing they would have to be blown away with a offer. Though I could also see them do something like Coca-Cola presents Lambeau Field.
Click to expand...
Which is what I believe Denver did. Thing is I don’t believe you get $10m per year @ Lambeau, probably closer to $3m / $5m.
 
FlaPack said:
Which is what I believe Denver did. Thing is I don’t believe you get $10m per year @ Lambeau, probably closer to $3m / $5m.
Click to expand...
And for that little GB would not bother to change the name. I would not be shocked if they got offers like that and turned them down.
 
I believe the naming rights over Lambeau Field would be a little better than the $3-5 mill range. I'd agree, except for the statements made by FlaPack about the Packers being one of the three most watched games on the schedule, when broadcast nationally. Just having the name floated with the Packers, like Coca-Cola, as was commented, it would be a cheap advertising investment. With someone like Coke, the opportunities would be endless, including tailgate involvement, logo on tickets, just about everything. Obviously more recognizable than a bank, or other entity, that's local.

If I was Coke, I'd go after that puppy, and if I was the Packers, I'd like locking up with them, because the Green Bay Packers and the Coca-Cola brands are two of the most well known in the US. Just my opinion.
 
TW said:
I believe the naming rights over Lambeau Field would be a little better than the $3-5 mill range. I'd agree, except for the statements made by FlaPack about the Packers being one of the three most watched games on the schedule, when broadcast nationally. Just having the name floated with the Packers, like Coca-Cola, as was commented, it would be a cheap advertising investment. With someone like Coke, the opportunities would be endless, including tailgate involvement, logo on tickets, just about everything. Obviously more recognizable than a bank, or other entity, that's local.

If I was Coke, I'd go after that puppy, and if I was the Packers, I'd like locking up with them, because the Green Bay Packers and the Coca-Cola brands are two of the most well known in the US. Just my opinion.
Click to expand...
The problem is that they are only “on air” 8 weeks out of the year so the impressions would be minimal.

Coke is more interested in vending / pouring rights, they don’t need the brand exposure. Just look at who the recent deals are with, Fin Tech, Crypto. They need brand building
 
GBP4EVER said:
And for that little GB would not bother to change the name. I would not be shocked if they got offers like that and turned them down.
Click to expand...
They probably get that for the naming of the gates there now in total, about $3m for the entire “package”.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top