- Messages
- 7,425
- Reaction score
- 6,253
Compare these two players
Player A & B - Two years
2016
Player A - $13.750 M, 24 tackles, 5.0 sacks, 1 FF, 0 FR
Player B - $10.500 M, 23 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 2 FF, 1 FR
2017
Player A - $15.075 M, 43 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 1 FF, 1 FR
Player B - $ 3.750 M, 33 tackles, 11.0 sacks, 2 FF, 2 FR
Which player would you keep, or would you keep both? These are the stats of a Packer, and an ex-Packer. Player A is Clay Matthews, and player B is Julius Peppers. In all honesty, the Packers moved on without Peppers, but a three headed monster like Matthews, Peppers, and Perry, would have been an amazing group of three players who could reek havoc on offenses. When you look at the lower salary figure that Peppers got in 2017, then look at the stats, you have to wonder if the Packers really utilized him the way they should, and whether or not they should have negotiated another contract with him in the $4 mill range.
Now, if you want to say he was too old to keep, that's fine, but it won't change the facts that Peppers has always been a top conditioned player who spends very little time on the sidelines due to injury, and therefore age is much less of a factor.
Here's the links to salary and stats for review.
Packers cap & salaries
Stats
Player A & B - Two years
2016
Player A - $13.750 M, 24 tackles, 5.0 sacks, 1 FF, 0 FR
Player B - $10.500 M, 23 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 2 FF, 1 FR
2017
Player A - $15.075 M, 43 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 1 FF, 1 FR
Player B - $ 3.750 M, 33 tackles, 11.0 sacks, 2 FF, 2 FR
Which player would you keep, or would you keep both? These are the stats of a Packer, and an ex-Packer. Player A is Clay Matthews, and player B is Julius Peppers. In all honesty, the Packers moved on without Peppers, but a three headed monster like Matthews, Peppers, and Perry, would have been an amazing group of three players who could reek havoc on offenses. When you look at the lower salary figure that Peppers got in 2017, then look at the stats, you have to wonder if the Packers really utilized him the way they should, and whether or not they should have negotiated another contract with him in the $4 mill range.
Now, if you want to say he was too old to keep, that's fine, but it won't change the facts that Peppers has always been a top conditioned player who spends very little time on the sidelines due to injury, and therefore age is much less of a factor.
Here's the links to salary and stats for review.
Packers cap & salaries
Stats