Not sure if drafting blue chippers or All-pros is the best measure. I don't have the stats for All-pro players, but over the past 10 years, the top 5 teams for Pro-Bowl players is:
1-Dallas, 2a-K.C., 2b-San Fran, 4a-Houston, 4b-Seattle, 6a-Denver, 6b-Green Bay.
How's that stat working for 4 of those teams, especially KC and Houston. New England is tied for 10th with the Bears, Browns and Vikings.
While I would certainly prefer to see more top-flite talent in GB, I'd rather have a roster that is deep enough to win and hopefully get to the playoffs and win it all. I'm not saying TT is a genius. I hate some of his drafts and specific picks, but using the "star" metric to determine draft success may not be the answer. I fully admit, I don't know if those numbers in the chart indicate anything more than TT drafts a lot of guys and those guys play in a lot of games, because TT tends to go young, and the Packers give them a chance to play.
TT is living off the Rodgers pick, his seemingly uncanny ability to draft WRs, and to find capable starters and depth in the middle rounds.