- Messages
- 21,136
- Reaction score
- 8,463
Tucker Kraft being like the Jeffersons and moving on up knowing that bag is coming.
Packers 2026/27 Season Thread
- Thread starter Mark87
- Start date
- Messages
- 21,136
- Reaction score
- 8,463
Tucker Kraft is getting his
The Jaguars and standout TE Brenton Strange have agreed to terms on a 3 year extension worth up to $48M, with $25M guaranteed per his agents Jim Ivler, JR Roggio, and Jon Perzley @SPORTSTARSNYC
The Jaguars and standout TE Brenton Strange have agreed to terms on a 3 year extension worth up to $48M, with $25M guaranteed per his agents Jim Ivler, JR Roggio, and Jon Perzley @SPORTSTARSNYC
- Messages
- 8,158
- Reaction score
- 7,927
the refs were so messed up that they called nixon for a foul for allowing himself to be choked by a bears player.
- Messages
- 8,158
- Reaction score
- 7,927
NFL offseason winners and losers: Which teams actually improved?
NFL offseason winners and losers: Which teams actually improved?
Now that NFL rosters have been largely built, let’s examine who got better and who got worse. The Rams and Ravens have taken a step forward.
www.nytimes.com
i'll save you some time. according to this article, the packers are offseason losers. why? because they got rid of underperforming and/or overpriced players and replaced them with young talent.
Green Bay Packers
For a team coming off back-to-back wild-card-round exits and that hasn’t reached the conference championship game since the 2020 season, the Packers had a rather blah offseason. They lost top wide receiver Romeo Doubs, left tackle Rasheed Walker and linebacker Quay Walker, and they also saw cornerback Nate Hobbs and versatile offensive lineman Elgton Jenkins depart. On top of that, they’re dealing with the uncertainty swirling around Josh Jacobs’ domestic violence charges.The Bears won the NFC North last season, and the Vikings and Lions are also both threats, so the Packers will need several young players to assume larger roles if they hope to reach the playoffs this fall.
- Messages
- 8,193
- Reaction score
- 14,474
The Lions starting secondary has been engulfed in volcano fire, the Vikings HC is now involved in the Diana Rossini sex scandal and the Bears have no defensive front plus are about to start sharing office space with Oscar the Grouch in an Indiana dumpster. I'd say all four teams in the North have their issues.NFL offseason winners and losers: Which teams actually improved?
NFL offseason winners and losers: Which teams actually improved?
Now that NFL rosters have been largely built, let’s examine who got better and who got worse. The Rams and Ravens have taken a step forward.
i'll save you some time. according to this article, the packers are offseason losers. why? because they got rid of underperforming and/or overpriced players and replaced them with young talent.
Green Bay Packers
For a team coming off back-to-back wild-card-round exits and that hasn’t reached the conference championship game since the 2020 season, the Packers had a rather blah offseason. They lost top wide receiver Romeo Doubs, left tackle Rasheed Walker and linebacker Quay Walker, and they also saw cornerback Nate Hobbs and versatile offensive lineman Elgton Jenkins depart. On top of that, they’re dealing with the uncertainty swirling around Josh Jacobs’ domestic violence charges.
The Bears won the NFC North last season, and the Vikings and Lions are also both threats, so the Packers will need several young players to assume larger roles if they hope to reach the playoffs this fall.
- Messages
- 8,158
- Reaction score
- 7,927
i didn't say i agreed with the article. in fact, i thought we improved the roster quite a bit this offseason. of course, we won't know for sure until the games are played.
- Messages
- 8,193
- Reaction score
- 14,474
Oh I'm with you. All these teams have their problems, they all have the injuries and they all have playmakers. Going to come down to how well the injuries heal up and whose playmakers play the best.