Rodgers Wants Out

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cheesedog said:
They're trying to walk a fine line. Arod is notoriously thinned skinned. If they don't throw him a bone and he comes back they have to cover that. But they also can't knock the guys who sign thier paychecks. Unless you're Adams you can't afford to seem like you're taking sides.
Click to expand...
Well Adams is going into his FA year and he should be safe unless he gets hurt he will get paid by someone. Bak just got paid and this is his last big money deal so I doubt he is in any danger. But both are smart men and know not to throw anyone under the bus as it can only make them look bad to someone.
 
GBP4EVER said:
Let's go back to ML was hired. Murphy was reported to say to Rodgers don't be the problem. If true does this show that Murphy at least was growing tired of Rodgers and his diva attitude and this is more or less just the team saying ok we are near the point we are done with his diva attitude and Rodgers being like fine they ship me out of here then and now it's just who claims that no he did not break up with me I broke up with him BS.
Click to expand...
“Reported” with no context of the entire conversation.
 
GBP4EVER said:
Well I thought Adams already has said that he will take into consideration what happens with Rodgers with his own future with GB on signing a deal or not.
Click to expand...
Has it got to the point where we latch on to every word a player says? Sure he’s going to take that into consideration just like he would number of years , signing bonus , roster bonus yada yada yada. What’s he supposed to say, I’m signing no matter what. Now that would be idiotic
 
JBlood said:
Flat out insulting to everyone in the organization not named Aaron Rodgers. I hope every member of the team sees this garbage.

Click to expand...


Just a guess here, but with a first year QB, a fairly tough schedule, I think winning 6 games would be about it, without Rodgers. That said, it could be +/- 2, in my opinion. It's hard to judge with Love an unknown at this point.
 
TW said:
Just a guess here, but with a first year QB, a fairly tough schedule, I think winning 6 games would be about it, without Rodgers. That said, it could be +/- 2, in my opinion. It's hard to judge with Love an unknown at this point.
Click to expand...
Depends Love gets it 10-11 win team. Love flops talking about a 3-14 team
 
Packinatl said:
Has it got to the point where we latch on to every word a player says? Sure he’s going to take that into consideration just like he would number of years , signing bonus , roster bonus yada yada yada. What’s he supposed to say, I’m signing no matter what. Now that would be idiotic
Click to expand...
Though Adams will get top money from whomever do you really want to play with a large likely downgrade at QB?
 
TW said:
Just a guess here, but with a first year QB, a fairly tough schedule, I think winning 6 games would be about it, without Rodgers. That said, it could be +/- 2, in my opinion. It's hard to judge with Love an unknown at this point.
Click to expand...
The system ML wants to run does not require a great QB, it needs a couple of decent RB and a lot of play-action and you can even get by with the short passing game. Also, we play in the North with the Vikings and Lions...that's 4 wins by it's self. We win 7-9 games even with Love.

Keep this in Mind...Kirk Cousins averaged 4,200 yards passing yards a year and 25 touchdowns in this system. Yeah, the same dingbat we have been playing against the past few years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top