Wisconsin wants to educate athletes on NIL, not oversee contracts. But some proposed deals raised questions.

Packinatl said:
Strongly disagree. There is zero merit and basis to sue. Especially states with legislation. And unless they are losing out on 6 figures which is unlikely it’s a waste of time
Click to expand...
If a kid gets denied even a 10K sponsorship he won't be happy
 
TW said:
It doesn't matter what we think. It doesn't matter what we think the merit is. Anyone can bring a lawsuit. That's the point. An attorney might well do it just for the publicity of doing it. Even if the Judge dismisses it, there was still a lawsuit in conjunction with the issue.
Click to expand...
Yep this what I am saying you wil have some laway who is willing to talk to a kid into challeaning the system.
 
Packinatl said:
And if the guidelines are in place and it’s policy that’s just too bad
Click to expand...
Then I guess no one should ever challenge any law ever and we should just bar anyone from suing for anything ever
 
GBP4EVER said:
Then I guess no one should ever challenge any law ever and we should just bar anyone from suing for anything ever
Click to expand...
I feel like I’m beating a dead horse. Lawsuits are based on merit. NIL laws and legislation are drafted with specific guidelines. If you want to fight it be prepared to prove it’s unconstitutional based on state law. It’s would cost more to fight. And why in the wide world of sports sue the hand that feeds you
 
Packinatl said:
I feel like I’m beating a dead horse. Lawsuits are based on merit. NIL laws and legislation are drafted with specific guidelines. If you want to fight it be prepared to prove it’s unconstitutional based on state law. It’s would cost more to fight. And why in the wide world of sports sue the hand that feeds you
Click to expand...
History simply states that if there's a difference of opinion on any issue, eventually there will be a lawsuit. You're arguing the merit factor, but that doesn't make it disappear. It will, more than likely, be dismissed in a court room.
 
TW said:
History simply states that if there's a difference of opinion on any issue, eventually there will be a lawsuit. You're arguing the merit factor, but that doesn't make it disappear. It will, more than likely, be dismissed in a court room.
Click to expand...
Yep even the thoughest laws seem to get challenged even if the case is likely to get dismissed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top