- Messages
- 18,944
- Reaction score
- 6,653
That could be GB does love to tie in roster bonus money into deals.Maybe not if the bonus money was tied to roster bonus. Structure matters
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That could be GB does love to tie in roster bonus money into deals.Maybe not if the bonus money was tied to roster bonus. Structure matters
It’s semantics. And also there is a big difference between offered on paper and discussed parametersI think there was some new money guranteed I just don't know how much it could have been very low and the highest paid money was all base salary he never sees later in deal
Camp is starting, big news cycleThough we heard they did this months ago why would it be re-hashed now
AgreedMaybe not if the bonus money was tied to roster bonus. Structure matters
I think offer made but guarantee was lowIt’s semantics. And also there is a big difference between offered on paper and discussed parameters
Yeah that's true ESPN wants clicks for stories.Camp is starting, big news cycle
This has noting to do with ESPN in the big picture, its about the GB FO moving the narrative and goal postsYeah that's true ESPN wants clicks for stories.
Maybe. Maybe GB knows he's not showing up next week and wanted this out there.This has noting to do with ESPN in the big picture, its about the GB FO moving the narrative and goal posts
maybe part of it, maybe just a hedge. No way of telling. The tweet was so vague that it leaves a-lot of room for plausible deniability on GB's partMaybe. Maybe GB knows he's not showing up next week and wanted this out there.