Davante Traded!?

So saw this name thrown around a few times he has 1 year left on rookie deal and thats DK Metcalf. Some say maybe Seattle will trade him off for draft assets to rebuild there.
 
GBP4EVER said:
So saw this name thrown around a few times he has 1 year left on rookie deal and thats DK Metcalf. Some say maybe Seattle will trade him off for draft assets to rebuild there.
Click to expand...
mmm no I doubt it and he'll be too much. Pass, I say again go draft a couple of solid WR and move on. GB fans need to get over the vets from other teams fetish
 
Mark87 said:
mmm no I doubt it and he'll be too much. Pass, I say again go draft a couple of solid WR and move on. GB fans need to get over the vets from other teams fetish
Click to expand...
I think it will take awhile. They're also going to have to get used to the fact GB is not one player away from being a SB contender. This year, despite him still being here, is the first building year for the post Arod era. Sorry, despite what people say about the NFC Packers SB window closed after last year.

They won during the reg season without Adams sure. But that's not the playoffs where you need guys who can make insane catches. GB does not have that guy and WR don't just step into GB and produce year 1....
 
Mark87 said:
mmm no I doubt it and he'll be too much. Pass, I say again go draft a couple of solid WR and move on. GB fans need to get over the vets from other teams fetish
Click to expand...
Don't know if it's so much a fetish, I think it's people trying to rationalize two things that are seemingly incongruous: 1.) the team retained 39 year old Aaron Rodgers for two more years, paying him through the nose, and 2.) the team's cupboard is bare at WR, which requires building it through the draft, where it will take 2 years to really develop new talent at the position. The two things don't make sense together, so fans are assuming there will be bridge players to make keeping Rodgers make any sense at all.
 
rpiotr01 said:
Don't know if it's so much a fetish, I think it's people trying to rationalize two things that are seemingly incongruous: 1.) the team retained 39 year old Aaron Rodgers for two more years, paying him through the nose, and 2.) the team's cupboard is bare at WR, which requires building it through the draft, where it will take 2 years to really develop new talent at the position. The two things don't make sense together, so fans are assuming there will be bridge players to make keeping Rodgers make any sense at all.
Click to expand...
I am not wholly speaking on this occasion.... every stinking year they want this guy and that guy and swear that's the missing piece. It's the "Reggie White" syndrome. That was an exception to the rule and most can't understand it.
 
Mark87 said:
mmm no I doubt it and he'll be too much. Pass, I say again go draft a couple of solid WR and move on. GB fans need to get over the vets from other teams fetish
Click to expand...
We need a veteran #1. I agree draft a guy, maybe two in the 2nd or 3rd, but they're not gonna be ready year one, possibly not year two.
 
Nerd said:
We need a veteran #1. I agree draft a guy, maybe two in the 2nd or 3rd, but they're not gonna be ready year one, possibly not year two.
Click to expand...
Depends on point of view. If you think GB is still SB competitive then you a vet makes sense. However if you're like me and don't see this team as a realistic SB contender then save the $$ and look ahead a few years.
 
Mark87 said:
mmm no I doubt it and he'll be too much. Pass, I say again go draft a couple of solid WR and move on. GB fans need to get over the vets from other teams fetish
Click to expand...
Question is do you go WR round 3 and 4 and take OL or LB early
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top