Pass Interference Rule review

Packinatl said:
I’m over it. Move on
Click to expand...

you know why i'm not over it? because you have packers fans saying that mvs should have caught that ball with his hands and not with his body. how do you catch a ball with your hands when the defender is wrapping his arms around you trapping your arms against your body?

and then you have other fans of the team trying justify why the refs did not call interference.

otherwise, i might just be over it too. it's just another packers loss that coulda-shoulda been a win.
 
Last edited:
realitybytes said:
you know why i'm not over it? because you have packers fans saying that mvs should have caught that ball with his hands and not with his body. how do you catch a ball with your hands when the defender is wrapping his arms around you trapping your arms against your body?

and then you have other fans of the team trying justify why the refs did not call interference.

otherwise, i might just be over it too. it's just another packers loss that coulda-shoulda been a win.
Click to expand...
And vs Minnesota we benefited from 2 bad PI that coulda shoulda been a loss, its over done
 
Actually it wasn't pass interference. MVS was within 1 yard of the LOS. DPI cannot be called within 1 yard of the LOS. It can however be called defensive holding. According the that rule I believe it was, but holding is not reviewable unfortunately.

Watching the replay again I see the Packers pick play actually forced MVS back running parallel to the LOS which is why he was not far enough for DPI. At first I did not think this but the rewatching shows me Rodgers really did have time to hold the ball and the DB covering Sheppard had blown it and it would have been an easy TD toss. tc(

 
I'm so over this, and ready for an all new outrage to occupy my time. Let's go Week 5!
 
Budman said:
On the field and then in Shout when Score gets worked up
Click to expand...

See the source image


 
The pendulum swings back the other way - that Kevin King play, how was that not PI or holding or illegal contact or unnecessary roughness?
 
rpiotr01 said:
The pendulum swings back the other way - that Kevin King play, how was that not PI or holding or illegal contact or unnecessary roughness?
Click to expand...
Yes refs should have called illegal contact on play Packers got away with one
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top